
Extreme weather & climate change
For years, scientists have warned us that climate change will lead to bigger, more intense, and more frequent storms. But it turns out they’re not the only ones who knew.
Whether it’s sea level rise making coastal cities more prone to flooding during storm surges, warmer ocean temperatures leading to stronger winds and rains, or climate-exacerbated drought, the scientific connections between climate change and extreme weather events are clear. And the consequences for communities on the frontlines are massive.
Storms like Hurricanes Katrina, Andrew, Sandy, Ike, Harvey, Irma, and others have claimed hundreds of lives in the United States alone. They’ve displaced hundreds of thousands of people — some who still can’t return home decades later — and destroyed livelihoods and businesses. The combined financial cost of these disasters is well into the billions. And while science cannot tell us that climate change caused these storms, it does tell us without a doubt that it made them more intense and more damaging.

But it turns out it’s not just climate scientists who have known this was coming. The fossil fuel industry did, too — decades ago.
Exxon researchers warned management in 1982 that impacts from climate change could be catastrophic. But instead of acting to protect the public, Exxon and other fossil fuel companies waged a decades-long campaign to sow doubt about climate science, block policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and protect their own profits.
Sitting with the knowledge that climate change is real and its impacts serious, Exxon and others continued to exploit fossil fuels, worsening the problem and blocking the path to renewable energy.
Climate denial is not a victimless crime. When climate-fueled extreme weather events strike, it’s those who deny science and block climate action that must answer to the victims.
Keep learning about…

California climate emergency

Fossil fuel phase-out

The Arctic
-
Permit To kill: Potential health and economic impacts from U.S. LNG export terminal permitted emissions
Research from Sierra Club and Greenpeace USA shows that permitted emissions from LNG terminals are associated with major public health costs.
-
What Biden’s LNG Pause Does and Doesn’t Do
Today the Biden-Harris Administration announced a “pause” on new export approvals for liquefied natural gas (LNG) projects, while the Department of Energy (DOE) reviews its LNG export policy. This is…
-
LNG Tanker Tracker
The U.S. recently became the world’s leading exporter of liquified natural gas (LNG). Much of that is exported via the Gulf Coast from facilities in Texas and Louisiana. Greenpeace USA…
-
Gulf Coast Terminal Build Out
Methane gas is converted into Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) and then loaded onto tankers at large, complex export terminals. The scale of LNG exports is limited by the capacity of…
-
What are LNG Exports?
Methane or fossil gas (usually called “natural” gas in the U.S.) is a fossil fuel that is used to generate electrical power, heat buildings, and power heavy industry. Thanks to…
-
Liquefied Natural Gas Exports 101
In recent years, the United States has become the world’s largest oil and gas driller, and an increasing amount of fossil gas production is being directly exported to other countries…
-
Too Fast For Gas: Problems at Venture Global’s Calcasieu Pass Should Not Be Overlooked
Last month, Venture Global told regulators and customers that issues with the Calcasieu Pass LNG facility will delay the start of commercial operations. They described the issues as “failures in…