Anti-SLAPP Lawsuit

Greenpeace International vs. Energy Transfer

In a clear message to corporate bullies everywhere, Greenpeace International initiated the first test of the European Union’s anti-SLAPP Directive by filing a lawsuit in Dutch court against US-based fossil fuel pipeline company Energy Transfer. A hearing is scheduled for July 2025.

Climate March during COP25 in Madrid. © Pablo Blazquez / Greenpeace

Inside the legal fight against SLAPPs

The meritless lawsuits filed by Energy Transfer (ET) against Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US since 2017 are clear-cut examples of SLAPPs (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation). Like all SLAPPs, ET’s lawsuits have been an attempt to bury nonprofits and activists in legal fees, push them towards bankruptcy and ultimately silence dissent. 

Based in the Netherlands, Greenpeace International is citing Dutch law as well as the European Union’s anti-SLAPP Directive in seeking to recover all damages and costs it has suffered as a result of ET’s back-to-back, meritless lawsuits demanding hundreds of millions of dollars against GPI and the Greenpeace entities in the United States.

Documents