JUMP TO PIERRE POILIEVRE’S VOTING RECORD // JUMP TO SHAREABLE GRAPHICS

Pierre Poilievre speaks with conviction. “We are Conservatives,” he says. “We don’t believe in big fat government programs. We don’t believe in giving money.”
At first, that might sound like ordinary political talk. But these words are more than slogans. They are signals. They draw lines between who is deserving of support, and who is not. Between who counts, and who is left behind.
When someone seeking to lead this country repeatedly tells us what they don’t believe in, we must ask: what values are left? What kind of future is being offered and for whom?
This is not about fiscal restraint. It’s about stripping away the systems that many of us rely on to survive and thrive. It’s about making life harder for people navigating poverty, housing precarity, chronic illness, disability, single parenthood, systemic racism, colonial legacies, gender-based violence. And then telling them it’s their fault.
Poilievre received a government pension at the age of 31. Later, he tried to target other MPs over their pensions in a public stunt. The reality? His own pension is roughly three times larger, projected to be around $230,000 annually by the time he turns 65. That number will only grow if he becomes Prime Minister. Soon after securing his pension, he voted to raise the retirement age for others to 67. He speaks of independence and “the value of hard work,” but only applies those values to communities who’ve been denied fair access to opportunities for generations. In 2008, he questioned whether survivors of residential schools should receive compensation, arguing instead that Indigenous peoples just need to “work harder.” In 2023, he addressed a group that claimed the harms of residential schools were a “myth.”
This is not just a political position. It’s an erasure of truth. It’s a refusal to reckon with Canada’s history and its ongoing impacts.
And it’s part of a larger pattern. When Bernie Sanders tells people to “Listen not to what they say, watch what they do,” that applies here, too. So let’s take a look at Pierre’s record, shall we?
Pierre’s Record
Poilievre has consistently voted against supports that help people meet basic needs: affordable housing, childcare, dental care, medication, contraceptives, and food programs in schools. He’s opposed expanding the pension plan, raising the minimum wage, strengthening workers’ rights, and protecting our environment.
When communities needed pandemic relief, he called these supports wasteful. “We don’t believe in giving money,” he said. But that’s not true. He believes in directing money to those who already have wealth – real estate developers, grocery magnates, long-term care corporations. His inner circle includes lobbyists for billion-dollar companies and donors who host him in mansions across the country.
So the question isn’t whether government spending is good or bad. The question is: who does he believe is worth investing in?
He has built a platform by demonizing trans and non-binary people, erasing gender diversity, and promoting anti-2SLGBTQIA+ rhetoric. He’s given space to those who oppose reproductive justice, and opened the door to legislation that would control our bodies. He supported banning niqabs. He posed with “Straight Pride” t-shirts during Pride. He talks of “radical gender ideology” as if our right to exist safely is up for debate,. while concluding that “wokeism” has “reinserted and invented” racism in Canada.
These aren’t accidental moments. They are deliberate strategies of exclusion. They distract, divide, and dehumanize.
Pierre Poilievre is not just rejecting government programs – he is rejecting the idea of collective care. He is rejecting the principle that society has a responsibility to ensure that every person, no matter their income, gender, race, ability, or background, can live with dignity and possibility.
And yet, he presents himself as the voice of the “common person.” But the people whose lives are most affected by his policies – the single mom trying to find childcare, the young person navigating systemic racism, the worker forced to choose between rent and medication, the trans teen seeking safety – are not included in his version of Canada. And when asked directly to clarify which social programs he will eliminate, he consistently refuses to answer the question.
This is not about left versus right. This is about whose lives are made harder by policy decisions that treat care as a luxury. It’s about whether we believe that being housed, fed, affirmed, and safe are rights or rewards that only some are allowed to earn.
Canada is being asked to choose.
Do we want a future that punishes people for needing support?
Or one that uplifts us all?
Do we want a society built on scarcity, shame, and suspicion?
Or one grounded in care, justice, and interdependence?
Pierre Poilievre is betting on the politics of resentment. But there is another way. One that sees every person as inherently worthy. One that understands that the measure of a country is not how it treats the most powerful, but how it supports those facing the greatest barriers.
This is a time to be bold. To reject false choices. To organize, to vote, to imagine.
When someone tells you, “we don’t believe in giving money,” ask yourself: Who is “we”? Who is being left out? And what kind of Canada are we willing to fight for?
Because the future is not written yet. And it doesn’t belong to Pierre Poilievre. It belongs to all of us.
Pierre’s Voting Record & Political Career
List format is below the chart // Shareable graphics below list
YEAR | VOTED AGAINST | VOTED FOR | STATEMENT |
2004 | Raising the federal minimum wage Bill C-48 federal anti-scab legislation – from 2004 to 2023 (voted 8 times against it) | ||
2005 | Defined marriage as a union between ‘one man and one women t the exclusion of all others” | ||
2006 | Bill C-31, An Act respecting cost of living relief measures related to dental care and rental housing housing affordable and address Canada’s housing crisis | ||
2007 | |||
2008 | Said Indigenous Peoples needed to learn the value of hard work more than they needed compensation for residential schools | ||
2009 | Bill C-31, An Act respecting cost of living relief measures related to dental care and rental housing housing affordable and address Canada’s housing crisis | Used the term ‘tar baby’ in the House of Commons | |
2010 | Bill C-31, An Act respecting cost of living relief measures related to dental care and rental housing housing affordable and address Canada’s housing crisis | Received a government pension at 31. | |
2011 | |||
2012 | Increased the age of eligibility for Old Age Security (OAS) and the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) from 65 to 67 Supported C-377 and C-525 bills, which tried to bury unions | Support for eliminating dependable defined benefits pensions and replacing them with inferior plans that take all the risk off banks and bosses and put it on the backs of workers – Pooled Registered Pension Plan (PRPP) employer participation and contributions are voluntary. 43.5 billion cut to healthcare funding | |
2013 | Bill C-31, An Act respecting cost of living relief measures related to dental care and rental housing housing affordable and address Canada’s housing crisis | Bill C-377 – An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (labour organizations): The bill required unions to publicly disclose detailed financial information, including salaries, expenses, and political activities—seen widely as an attempt to undermine union autonomy. | Worked to bring American-style anti-union laws to Canada |
2014 | Bill C-31, An Act respecting cost of living relief measures related to dental care and rental housing housing affordable and address Canada’s housing crisis | Introduced the fair election action, which aimed to make it harder for Canadians to vote Bill C-525 – Employees’ Voting Rights Act: It made it harder to unionize by replacing card-check certification with a mandatory secret ballot vote—making it easier for employers to discourage unionization. | Pierre promoted allowing employers to abandon the pension they promised to workers |
2015 | Tax cuts for the working middle class (Bill C-2) | Promoted a ‘niqab ban’ | |
2016 | expansion of the Canada Pension Plan (CPP), the most significant improvement to Canada’s public pension system in 50 years Canada Child Benefit – The CCB replaced the previous Universal Child Care Benefit (UCCB). Poilievre opposed the change, criticizing it for being redistributive and framed it as part of “big government.” | ||
2017 | Big donors are real estate investors: Richard Abboud, the CEO of an REIT called Forum Asset Management is listed as donating $7,875 to the federal Conservative party since 2017, according to Elections Canada records. | ||
2018 | Bill C-31, An Act respecting cost of living relief measures related to dental care and rental housing housing affordable and address Canada’s housing crisis | ||
2019 | Bill C-31, An Act respecting cost of living relief measures related to dental care and rental housing housing affordable and address Canada’s housing crisis | ||
2020 | Talked down pandemic supports that helped millions of Canadians pay their bills during the crisis | ||
2021 | a 10% increase to the Old Age Security pension for those aged 75 and above $10-a-day child care program | Called child care a ‘slush fund,’ and tried to cut programs that support the middle class | |
2022 | Tax-free first home savings account (bill C-19) Dental care Bill C-31 | Used misogynist YouTube tags to court far-right supporters Encouraged Canadians to ‘opt-out on inflation’ with volatile crypto-currencies | |
2023 | A proposed $196.1 billion funding package aimed at reducing surgery and emergency room wait times. This funding was intended to address critical backlogs and improve patient care across the country. | Followed the American far-right playbook to use anti 2sLGBTQI+ language Pushed an anti-vaccine agenda Committed to free votes, allowing his MP to bring forward anti-abortion legislation Supported illegal convoy blockades Delivered a speech to a group that claimed it was a “myth” that residential schools robbed Indigenous children of their childhood Posed with someone wearing a ‘straight pride’ shirt during Pride season | |
2024 | Taxing the rich by opposing raising the capital gains inclusion rate Support for Ukraine National School Food Program – The 2024 federal budget included significant investment in a national school food program. Poilievre has publicly criticized it and has not committed to supporting it. Bill-C24 – an act respecting pharmacare – free diabetes medication. Petition e-4516 for free access to prescription contraceptives across Canada. | Visited and courted far-right extremist groups Said he’d use the notwithstanding clause, overriding Canadian’s rights Announced his intention to eliminate the federal Housing Accelerator Fund if elected as Prime Minister. He criticized the fund, stating that it was ineffective and contributed to increased bureaucracy, thereby hindering housing construction. | |
2025 | Poilievre stated he is only aware of two genders and that bathrooms should be exclusively for men or for women, while also saying that the government should not involve itself in questions of gender identity. |
VOTED AGAINST:
- Bill C-31, An Act respecting cost of living relief measures related to dental care and rental housing
- Affordable housing and addressing Canada’s housing crisis (2006, 2009, 2010, 2013, 2014, 2018 and 2019)
- Bill C-48 Raising the federal minimum wage (2004)
- Bill C-2 Tax cuts for the working middle class (2015)
- Bill C-64 Free diabetes medication
- Bill C-19 Tax-free first home savings account (2022)
- e-4516 Free Contraceptives
- $10-a-day child care
- Dental care
- The National School Food Program
- The Canada Child Benefit
- Pharmacare
- Voted 8 times against federal anti-scab legislation (2004-2023)
- In 20 years as a MP, he has voted against protecting the environment 400 times
- Voted against expansion of the Canada Pension Plan (CPP), the most significant improvement to Canada’s public pension system in 50 years (2016)
- Voted against a 10% increase to the Old Age Security pension for those aged 75 and above (2021)
- Voted against taxing the rich by opposing raising the capital gains inclusion rates (2024)
- Subsidized daycare
- Same-sex marriage
- Stronger gun control
WHAT HE’S FOR:
- Voted for $43.5 billion cut to healthcare funding
- Voted for $196.1 billion cut to funds for surgery and emergency room wait times
- As Housing Minister in Stephen Harper’s Conservative government, he allowed 800,000 affordable rental units to be sold off to corporate landlords and developers.
- Voted to increase the age of eligibility for Old Age Security (OAS) and the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) from 65 to 67 (2012)
- Pierre promoted allowing employers to abandon the pension they promised to workers
- Supported hiking the retirement age from 65-67
- Supported C-377 and C-525 bills, which tried to bury unions
- Supported eliminating dependable defined benefits pensions and replacing them with inferior plans that take all the risk off banks and bosses and put it on the backs of workers, replace with Pooled Registered Pension Plan (PRPP) employer participation and contributions are voluntary
- Defined marriage as a union between ‘one man and one women t the exclusion of all others” (2005)
- Said Indigenous Peoples needed to learn the value of hard work more than they needed compensation for residential schools (2008) – “are we really getting value for all of this money” value of hard work, independence and self-reliance
- Worked to bring American-style anti-union laws to Canada (2013)
- Made it harder for Canadians to vote (2014) by introducing the Fair Election Act
- Promoted a ‘niqab ban’ (2015) “not going to succumb to political correctness in order to accommodate a practice that it is not aligned with Canadian values”
- Followed the American far-right playbook to use anti 2sLGBTQI+ language (2023) – radical gender ideology on kids – woke gender ideology imposed on our children – radical gender ideology – religion of gender ideology, proponents of radical gender ideology.
- Called child care a ‘slush fund,’ and tried to cut programs that support the middle class (2021)
- Encouraged Canadians to ‘opt-out on inflation’ with volatile crypto-currencies (2022)
- Used misogynist YouTube tags to court far-right supporters (2022) – men going their own way: term coined by misogynistic men who try to cut women completely out of their lives
- Pushed an anti-vaccine agenda (2023)
- Committed to free votes, allowing his MP to bring forward anti-abortion legislation (2023) endorsed by an anti-choice group. Interview with Jordan Peterson was sponsored by an anti-choice group.
- Supported illegal convoy blockades (2023) calling them “cheerful, patriotic, optimistic Canadians”
- Delivered a speech to a group that claimed it was a “myth” that residential schools robbed Indigenous children of their childhood (2023)
- Visited and courted far-right extremist groups such as Diagolon (2022-2024)
- Turned his back on Ukraine (2024) – voted against support
- Said he’d use the notwithstanding clause, overriding Canadian’s rights (2024)
- Talked down pandemic supports that helped millions of Canadians pay their bills during the crisis (2020) “we are conservatives we don’t believe in that”, we “don’t believe in big fat government programs”
- Posed with someone wearing a ‘straight pride’ shirt during Pride season (2023)
- Used the term ‘tar baby’ in the House of Commons (2009)
- Terminated the federal Housing Accelerator Fund, cutting billions of dollars from housing construction and making it harder for municipalities to build more homes.
- In January 2025, Poilievre stated he is only aware of two genders and expressed that the government should not involve itself in questions of gender identity.
- Has publicly stated that he will defund the CBC
- Big donors are real estate investors: Richard Abboud, the CEO of an REIT called Forum Asset Management is listed as donating $7,875 to the federal Conservative party since 2017, according to Elections Canada records.
- Poilievre’s chief strategist is a lobbyist for Galen Weston and Loblaws
- His deputy leader lobbied to protect a for-profit long-term care company that saw record profits and high fatalities during the pandemic
- His caucus chair is the chairman of a major grocery chain
SHARABLES


Discussion
He is very dangerous, a mini Trump. This message needs to be seen by everyone.
Too much like Trump to be trusted.
how can I share this info
Please post it on you tube. People have no idea about him.
Polieve but be pushed down, stepped on and taken away. He will not become the Prime Minister because WE ARE NOT AMERICANS - WE ARE CANADIAN and he does not hold the same values as we do! MARK CARNEY IS OUR PRIME MINISTER and that's man we should be focusing on. AMEN
Canada's donald trump--an enormous AH.
I follow politics and have seen the way Pollievre's mind works. Who cares if the natural world is depleted and a good life for our children will become no longer possible if people like himself get their way. Sadly, too many people don't realize how his policies will affect us in the future. Need, not greed, is how indigenous people see the world. If only too many people who have the right to vote thought the same.
Thank you for this report! But seriously, you should bring out his neo-liberal think tank influences, see https://kathleenmccroskey.substack.com/p/dangerous-neo-liberal-think-tanks And note that Danielle Smith was a Fraser Institute intern, and Fraser Institute and Heritage Foundation are linked. HF wrote Project 2025. What does Poilievre's Canada 2025 agenda look like?
Yes! Working on a piece now! Let me know if you have any other resources you wish to share.
Great article. Comprehensive look at Pierre's career and easier to navigate than ourcommons. Shared it many times already . There is an important mistake. He eliminated 800 000 housing units. Not $800 000 dollars. Thanks for the great work, Shallon
Fixed! Thank you so much for pointing out the mistake and for sharing!! It takes a village to defend democracy #DontTrumpCanada #RejectMapleMAGA
Hi !!! I am yours. I understand and o send you all my Respect for all. Be stand !! Do not give up !! Stand up !! You are on The Right way !!! Continue All My Respect and my friendship from France, Bordeaux. Best whishes Miss Sai
Keep PP away from any leadership decision. He does not support anything that has to do with the environment and saving our earth.
PP is the wrong person to lead Canada.
Hey there! I'm a progressive content creator. I host channels under my name (Art Lightstone) and Green Neighbour. I'm currently making a video on Pierre Poilievre's Top Ten votes in Support of the Working Class (meant to be satirical), and I'm just doing some fact checking. I find that it appears that Poilievre actually voted in support of Bill C-35 ($10 a day childcare) on the 3rd reading on Monday, June 19, 2023. Could you tell me why it's asserted that Poilievre voted against the $10 a day childcare? Is this because he opposed it, but he knew darned well it would pass, so he wanted to maintain some credibility in the eyes of the working class?
Hi Arthur, Pierre Poilievre voted AGAINST $10/day childcare – in the House notes, he and the conservatives argued that it would lead to increased government spending and taxes. They instead favour market-driven solutions like tax credits, which historically have never worked: "Tax credits do not lower the price of child care nor necessarily result in the expansion of licensed high-quality child care spaces. Instead, families can try to use their modest tax savings towards lower-quality, and sometimes less safe, for-profit and unregulated home-based care when licensed care is not available. Tax credits also disadvantage lower-income families who still cannot afford any type of child care, even with the support of the credit." https://springmag.ca/will-poilievre-cancel-10-a-day-child-care
Thank you for taking the time to do this work. Environmental care cannot be isolated from an overall ethic and economy of care. We need leaders capable and willing of making evidence-based, not ideologically based, decisions for healthcare, economy, housing, and social programs .... or they will never make evidence-based decisions for the planet.
This needs to be published to refresh people’s memories. Or to impart knowledge to the people that were not interested in Canada politics till now and don’t know who they are voting for now. This is the most important federal election of our lifetime. Look south and see what is happening.
I would not vote for Him, He is just as bad as Donald Trump
Honestly for me, Mark Carney holds advanced degrees in economics from both Harvard University and the University of Oxford. As well as loads of real life work experience . Pierre Poilievre (PP) has a Bachelor of Arts Degree from Athabasca University which they are now trying to sell it as a University of Calgary. I am unsure if he has actually had a real job. And this is the best the Conservatives have to offer. PP is threatened by Mark Carney’s Bankers hair?? I think he’s earned it. In this critical time in history, we need a grown up to lead Canada. We need Mark Carney.
Thank you for compiling all this information in one place. Excellent job. Poilievre is a very disturbing individual and many of his promises totally contradict his past behaviour.